Quantum pattern – In quantum physics, can an event be predicted?

quantum pattern – In quantum physics, can an event be predicted?

quantum pattern
quantum pattern

Hello there, buddies. My ideas are incapable of distinguishing between good and wrong, and I have no idea whether I am correct or incorrect. But I never regard logic as right or incorrect, and Quantum Mechanics has also been proved to be valid on the basis of logic and reality by numerous scientists, therefore I must ignore this claim. It’s impossible. However, when I attempt to think about it. Is it thus correct to practise the vast world on the basis of possibilities?

Many quantum mechanics experts believe that all event is split into many possibilities until it is turned into a single possibility. Actually, his beliefs appear to be valid based on logic and reality, but I do not believe it is a wholly correct thought, even if this truth has been shown via mathematical and analytical studies.

Read Also :- A particle-wave duality is a particle-wave-vibration tripulity, not just a duality.

I believe that events occur in the cosmos because they are predetermined and without possibility; consequently, when I try to expand on this thought, numerous forms of problems arise, such as when thinking about the universe. Why isn’t Einstein a wonderful teacher or musician rather than a brilliant scientist? Let us attempt to discover a solution to this query. Before becoming a scientist, Einstein had the potential to become a great teacher or musician. But his childhood, schooling, and a variety of other events must have occurred for him to become a scientist.

So, what caused those things to happen to them? Because it was determined that he become a great scientist, that is, from birth to the present and future of time, such occurrences were contained to make him a great scientist.  

Read Also :-Parallel Universe -How to accept the concept of parallel universe?

May this happen, that is, the occurrence of any event could be part of some type of preset quantum pattern? When I attempt to think about it logically, it appears like it was predestined. I believe that for every event to occur in the cosmos, energy must move in time according to a quantum pattern at some level from which certain occurrences occur.

I believe that energy moves in a quantum pattern from one end of time to the other, leading to predestined occurrences. That is, energy passes from the past to the future, leaving little room for possibilities.

Read Also :- Are there more than 4 dimensions in the universe?

So I got to thinking about when possibilities are generated. Possibilities may be seen and comprehended in actuality. If any occurrence in the cosmos is preset, there is no room for chance, and if there are chances, predetermined things cannot exist. In quantum physics, however, both are feasible. I think so.

Events are determined when energy travels from the past end of time to the future, and probabilities occur when energy travels from the future end to the past. it’s possible. When we imagine an event to happen, in reality the energy travels from the end of the future to the past, thereby revealing the possibilities.

I’m not sure if my opinions are correct or incorrect, but this reasoning actually leads us to future correctness, which may be part of a quantum pattern.

Read More :- In quantum physics, can an event be predicted?

quantum pattern
quantum pattern

 

Watching this video and subscribe my youtube channel

Read Also :- X17 particle – A fifth force that contributes to the universe’s stability?

7 Comments

  1. This makes no sense. Quantum physics is totally random and it’s why things like photosynthesis and consciousness work. Predetermination is ancient idea proven false time after time. Yes there are tendencies for occurrences but they cannot be absolutely predicted, and you have free will to over rule any predictions.

    1. I completely agree with you, thank you. It is predicated, in my opinion, on my long-held beliefs. But because there are possibilities in everything, it is difficult to forecast anything with complete certainty.

      I respect your opinions, I should demonstrate sound reasoning and accurate perceptions of the facts.

  2. Yes, it IS possible to predict future occurances. Some people actually have the ability to do so. I’m not referring to the cheap parlor tricks of sideshow fortune tellers either. Some people actually possess this ability. Although science hasn’t caught up yet to how these individuals are able to do this, doesn’t mean it hasn’t been happening for centuries. What is recurringly annoying is the way science keeps “announcing” it’s “discovered” something that has already been known (just not labeled the way science would label it).

    1. Thank you for your reply; science is a way of thinking that tests things logically and mathematically. Why is it precisely what it is, so it is the mission of science to know and verify how much logical and mathematical foundation any hypothesis has, but it may also be that which is but is still based on logic and mathematics. It has not been folded, thus not believing it cannot be correct from a scientific standpoint. As a result, probabilities must be maintained and measured logically and mathematically.

  3. Now for the record I barely graduated high school matter fact I got my GED in jail so I have no clue what I’m talking about but I couldn’t help but notice that one of captions happened to say everything in the cosmos is predetermined. I love science and everything about it and to sit and simply believe that statement has got me like how cuz I mean like if things are predetermined who determined it. Who exactly is pulling the strings cuz that basically insinuates some one is playing puppet master. Has anyone ever thought about well how is everything predetermined when like a plan doesn’t fall through or when someone changes there mind. What I’m getting from that caption is that it was already said upon that I would reject that claim and talk all types of mumbo jumbo to you. Heck no please if the rocket scientist of yesterday today and tomorrow believe that then their exactly the reason why we have yet to be in flying cars and teleporting and time traveling. It’s pure stubbornness. I just ask whoever contributes to this can we go over the data one more time this time as a whole nation not just a group of professionals because even though yes they’re professionals at this type of things with PHDs and things of that sort it’s they’re stubbornness that has people like me losing faith in the advancement of technology. But hey what do I know Im just a guy from a concrete jungle.

    1. I believe that logic can be wrong or right, but logic always gives rise to new thinking, so we must keep our logic. Even if he is wrong. I do not believe that it is necessary to do a professional or some kind of PhD to extend logic, but also believe that we get a PhD or professional degree only when we always develop logic in the direction of thinking. There have been many such scientists in the past who did not have any degree or PhD professionally, yet on the basis of logic they were successful in convincing the world that they are right. I am also a common person. Still I want to put my arguments in front of the world. Without thinking that the world laughs at me or understands. Most of the people in the world believe in the divine noun, it depends on their thinking, I call it energy.

  4. Now for the record I barely graduated high school matter fact I got my GED in jail so I have no clue what I’m talking about but I couldn’t help but notice that one of captions happened to say everything in the cosmos is predetermined. I love science and everything about it and to sit and simply believe that statement has got me like how cuz I mean like if things are predetermined who determined it. Who exactly is pulling the strings cuz that basically insinuates some one is playing puppet master. Has anyone ever thought about well how is everything predetermined when like a plan doesn’t fall through or when someone changes there mind. What I’m getting from that caption is that it was already said upon that I would reject that claim and talk all types of mumbo jumbo to you. Heck no please if the rocket scientist of yesterday today and tomorrow believe that then their exactly the reason why we have yet to be in flying cars and teleporting and time traveling. It’s pure stubbornness. I just ask whoever contributes to this can we go over the data one more time this time as a whole nation not just a group of professionals because even though yes they’re professionals at this type of things with PHDs and things of that sort it’s they’re stubbornness that has people like me losing faith in the advancement of technology. But hey what do I know Im just a guy from a concrete jungle. I’ll leave you on this theory what if great scienctist like Einstein actually didn’t know the answer but because a fear of being laughed at or looked down upon had to much pride to say I don’t know. Im starting to believe that is the case for so many different fields of science and honestly somewhere down the line people just started “winging it” I mean like come on who could argue them down if they hold the PhD right. And the way society is no one ever likes to an outcast so everyone else having a need to be accepted just went along with it to so they could say they belonged to something. Cuz if their knowledge of math was as good they claim it was for surely every idea man has ever had could have and would have already been done. Please can we all stop being naive or am I in the Naive Realm.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.